If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.
You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

Rubrics for Wiki Collaboration

Page history last edited by Christen Allen 15 years, 2 months ago

Use these rubrics to judge the quality of your individual and group effort on the Tools for Technology Wiki. If your work is adequate, you will earn full credit for the purpose of this course. Still, you should strive to make your work stellar in as many ways as time permits. The Wiki category and the PBwiki article are samples of what your work could look like. If you have questions about the requirements, you may ask them in the comments section. I will clarify the rubric based on your comments.

Rubric for Group Work

Requirement	Stellar	Adequate	Less than Adequate
Link from Table of Contents	The link from the Table of Contents page takes you to a Wiki Page with the same category name	The link works but the page names may not match (and are therefore confusing).	The link is broken
Category page overview	The category page provides a well-written overview of the types of tools that fit in the category. Categories that include multiple types of tools should have longer overviews.	The content is thorough, but the writing has errors or is difficult to follow.	The overview contains little useful information.
List of technologies on category page	The list of technologies on the category page contains all of the example technologies given for the category in the Index plus some more additional technologies.	The list of technologies on the category page lists all of the technologies given for the category in the Index.	The list of technologies on the category page contains fewer technogies than provided in the Index.
Number of completed articles	The group completed at least as many articles as there were group members and all of the incomplete articles have stub pages.	The group completed as many articles as there were members in the group.	The group did not complete as many articles as there were members in the group.
Quality of Articles	All of the articles contain the following elements: Description of the technology including a link to the technology. A link back to the overview page. Step-by-step guide, including screen shots, to using the technology to accomplish a basic task. Links to guides created elsewhere on the internet are acceptable. Multiple examples of how the technology could be used in the classroom. References including external links. Additionally, the article should not contain grammatical errors or broken links.	All of the articles contain the following elements: Description of the technology including a link to the technology A link back to the overview page. Some advice on setting up an account or installing the technology. An example of how the technology could be used in the classroom. Additionally, the article should not contain grammatical errors or broken links.	Some of the articles are missing required elements and/or there are grammatical errors and broken links.
Cross-references	The articles are thoroughly cross-referenced within the category as well as to other categories, where appropriate.	The article is thoroughly cross-referenced within the category, but only has a few cross-references to other categories.	The article is poorly cross-referenced both within the category and across other categories.
Evidence of collaboration	The group used the comments on the page to plan their work and the page history shows that the group followed their plans. Also, all of the groups pages show edits from multiple group members and the work on each article seems equally distributed among group members.	The group used the comments on the page to plan their work and the page history shows that the group followed their plans. The groups pages show edits from multiple group members, but each article was primarily the wrtitten by a single author.	The wiki shows little evidence of collaboration.

Rubric for Individual Work

Requirement	Stellar	Adequate	Less than Adequate
Participate equally in creating the group's collaboration plan	Individual expressed his or her level of knowledge and/or interest in topics to other group members. Individual also provided information about his or her schedule and when he or she would be able to complete work on the project. The individual was respectful of other's time and talents and suggested ways that everyone could work together.	Individual expressed his or her level of knowledge and/or interest in topics to other group members. Individual also provided information about his or her schedule and when he or she would be able to work on the project. The individual was respectful of other's time and talents and made compromises when necessary.	Individual dictated what other group members should do or was so passive that they made no contribution to the plan.
Complete your portion of the work according to the group's collaboration plan	Individual completed his share of work according to the group plan and made helpful contributions to other group member's work beyond proofreading and fact checking.	Individual completed his or her share of the work according to the group plan and helped to proofread and fact check at least one other group member's work.	Individual did not do his or her share of the work,according to the group plan and evidenced by the page history and did not make any meaningful edits to or suggestions on other group members pages.

Comments (11)

I think this rubric is good. I especially like the requirement "evidence of collaboration." It is obvious on group projects when presentations were put together separately or whether the group collaborated to make connections and smooth transitions. With our pages, there must be consistency with each of our articles and the overall look to the page.

It is also important that we are respectful of each other's time and talents. That is something that is rarely graded in a classroom and I am glad it is on this rubric. We can all learn to be more respectful and professional, which means we can be graded on it as well!

I like the part about cross referencing. I think that by doing that it makes the article more useful because of the ability to get a better picture of the bigger connections that these tools have.

From what I understand about the assignment it is a very all-encompassing rubric that hits every point needed.

I like the rubric. I think, like Jenifer, that it hits all the points taht we need to cver. This way we will know what we have done and what we need to still complete.

I have been really impressed with all of rubrics for this class, especially this one. It is very clear cut on what is needed and expected of us. I like that it explains what the project needs and in a separate portion what we need to do.

I agree with the above comments: this is a very comprehensive rubric and very easy to understand. I clarified a typo, but besides that, this looks great!

It looks fine to me. It is good about being clear on what the difference between stellar and adequate work is, as well as between adequate and less-than-adequate.

It seems pretty good to me, although the whole group will be punished if one person doesn't do his or her part. I am not sure I like that.

The rubric helped me complete the assignment, I appreciate having a 'formula' for good marks.

@Olivia - The whole group will be punished? I'm curious where you found punishment in the rubric.

I agree with the comments thus far. This rubric is comprehensive and thorough.

You don't have permission to comment on this page.

Rubrics for Wiki Collaboration

Rubric for Group Work

Rubric for Individual Work

Rubrics for Wiki Collaboration

Page Tools

Insert links

Comments (11)

Eric Pratt said

mr. ross said

Jenifer Hoggan said

McKenzie Borup said

Hammari said

Christen Allen said

Meghan Christensen said

Olivia Seger said

mindyhinckley@msn.com said

Kimberly McCollum said

Nicole Manwaring said

Join this workspace

Navigator

SideBar

Recent Activity